- by John Reints
- Jul 27 2025
How Biomarkers Shape Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Explore how biomarkers guide therapy choices in advanced renal cell carcinoma, from PD‑L1 and VHL mutations to next‑gen sequencing and future tests.
Immunotherapy has changed how we fight cancer, but it doesn’t work the same for everyone. That’s where predictive markers step in – they tell doctors whether a patient is likely to respond to a specific immune‑based drug.
A predictive marker is a measurable feature—usually a protein, gene change, or DNA pattern—that correlates with treatment outcome. It’s like a road sign that says, “Turn left for a better chance of success.” Without it, doctors would be guessing.
Why do these markers matter? Because immunotherapy can be expensive, have tough side effects, and sometimes simply won’t help. Knowing who benefits saves time, money, and unnecessary toxicity.
Clinicians use marker results to decide if a checkpoint inhibitor, CAR‑T cell therapy, or another immune approach fits a patient’s tumor. The test result becomes part of the treatment plan, just like blood pressure or cholesterol levels.
Three markers dominate the conversation today: PD‑L1 expression, microsatellite instability‑high (MSI‑H) status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Each looks at a different piece of the tumor’s immune picture.
PD‑L1 testing checks how much of the PD‑L1 protein the tumor shows on its surface. Higher levels often predict a stronger response to drugs like pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. The test uses a simple biopsy and an immunohistochemistry stain.
MSI‑H status reflects a failure in the DNA‑repair system. Tumors with this defect tend to generate many abnormal proteins, making them more visible to the immune system. FDA‑approved immunotherapies work well for MSI‑H cancers, regardless of where they started.
TMB measures the total number of mutations in a tumor’s DNA. A high TMB suggests the tumor is a “mutational hotspot,” which can boost immune recognition. While not every high‑TMB cancer responds, it’s a useful piece of the puzzle.
Researchers are also watching newer markers such as LAG‑3, TIM‑3, and gene‑expression signatures. These aren’t routine yet, but early data show they might fine‑tune therapy choices in the next few years.
If you or a loved one is facing immunotherapy, ask your oncologist about these tests. Request the latest PD‑L1 score, MSI status, and TMB report. Knowing the numbers can help you discuss treatment options and understand potential benefits.
Don’t assume a single test tells the whole story. Often doctors combine several markers, imaging results, and clinical factors before recommending a specific drug.
Our site dives deeper into these topics. Check out the most relevant pieces:
Use these articles to get a clearer picture of how predictive markers shape modern cancer care. The more you know, the better you can partner with your healthcare team.
Explore how biomarkers guide therapy choices in advanced renal cell carcinoma, from PD‑L1 and VHL mutations to next‑gen sequencing and future tests.